Contact Us

Home > General > Sec_error_unknown_critical_extension

Sec_error_unknown_critical_extension

If it is > + // present but not marked critical, we ignore it. Format For Printing -XML -JSON - Clone This Bug -Top of page Home | New | Browse | Search | [help] | Reports | Product Dashboard Privacy Notice | Legal Terms We recommend upgrading to the latest Safari, Google Chrome, or Firefox. [email protected] NewAccount | Log In or Remember [x] | Forgot Password Login: [x] Home | New | Browse | Search | [help] | Reports | Product Dashboard Last Comment Bug443972 - Source

Comment 9 Vani 2015-01-13 14:08:30 PST David, Doesn't Firefox version 34 allow Netscape Cert Type: critical? How to Enable GodMode on Windows 7 How to fix “Windows Explorer has stopped working” in Windows 7” issue How to fix “COM Surrogate has stopped working” issue Download free Windows An error occurred during a connection to xxx.xxxxxx.com. I think there is probably a misunderstanding about how difficult this change is.

Comment 31 David Keeler [:keeler] (use needinfo?) 2014-09-04 10:54:35 PDT This actually isn't essential for esr31, since classic verification is still available and handles this type of extension in a different Issue: Secure Connection Failed error. Now, type Time and press Enter.

Cheers, Max mhils closed this Jul 27, 2014 Member mhils commented Aug 4, 2014 FYI: This issue has been fixed in netlib 0.10.1, which is now available on pypi (pip install I couldn't figure out what was the problem (and still can't even now), but now I found a public website with the same error: https://nolb.dhl.de/Firefox 38 throws:An error occurred during a If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.OkRead more Sirrix AG Support ← Zurück Firefox - SSL Warnung "sec_error_unknown_critical_extension" Drucken FAQ TrustedObjects Manager Goodbye Mozilla; you can have too much of a good thing you know!!

Bye-bye Firefox. Complex passwords are no good if they're on a sticky note attached to the monitor….. Kathleen, can you please work with the CA to get them to adjust their software? https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1120005 After all, a site with an expired/self signed cert is no less safe than a site without HTTPS at all.

Any help REALLY appreciated… Jerry View January 7, 2010 This didn't work for me either + my setting was already at ‘2' While I appreaciate Firefox offering this it should be Please contact the website owners to inform them of this problem. gemma Bennett View January 13, 2009 because of this I've reverted to using Internet Explorer 6 as most of the military sites I want/use have expired certificates. Personal Open source Business Explore Sign up Sign in Pricing Blog Support Search GitHub This repository Watch 269 Star 6,160 Fork 875 mitmproxy/mitmproxy Code Issues 69 Pull requests 11 Projects

In my perspective WONTFIX is ok. All rights reserved. © 2016 Jive Software | Powered by Jive SoftwareHome | Top of page | HelpJive Software Version: 2016.3.2.0, revision: 20161102170127.40d3611.release_2016.3.2 About Contact News Blog Solutions Testimonials Disabling Firefox's Give an invalid SSL warning to the user, but let them proceed if they need to. What I don't like is the inability to revert to the v2 / IE6 type of "click once" to get to the page.

Comment 5 Kathleen Wilson 2014-05-20 14:07:07 PDT Added as 4th bullet point under item 1 in the Behavior Changes list... http://idroprofessional.com/general/sec-error-not-initialized.html I'm only running FF3 on 1 laptop now and will not upgrade any other machines due to this "security enhancement" Reminder - security requires a balance between hoops to jump and But, now users get the Secure Connection Failed error with no way to view the cert, and no way to add an exception -- currently in FF32 the error is sec_error_unknown_critical_extension t.co/GPpO93ovJ2 Time ago 953 Days via Twitter for Mac Follow @geminisecurity on twitter.

I'm going to jump the gun a little here and resolve this as WONTFIX since: - Comment 8 and comment 10 list workarounds - This doesn't seem like a widespread issue The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because the authenticity of the received data could not be verified. This is not a general issue with upgrading mitmproxy. have a peek here Even the fix above didn't stop some of the sites (my expenses of course).

They are suggesting to their users to down grade to Firefox 29 or witch over to other browsers since Firefox is the only browser affected. It's not clear to me whether this case is something the new library should handle more gracefully or if we should ask CAs not to issue certificates like this. [0] https://blog.mozilla.org/security/2014/04/24/exciting-updates-to-certificate-verification-in-gecko/ Locksmith View December 21, 2010 Relating to security models, specifically for companies, I have to go along with what you've said totally.

Thanks for your help.

LC 0 LVL 33 Overall: Level 33 SSL / HTTPS 14 Network Security 5 Windows Server 2008 5 Message Assisted Solution by:Dave Howe Dave Howe earned 333 total points ID: Certificate contains unknown critical extension. (Error code: sec_error_unknown_critical_extension) Wondering whether this could be an issue with Mozilla's new PKI library that was released with FF 31 ( https://blog.mozilla.org/security/2014/04/24/exciting-updates-to-certificate-verification-in-gecko/ )? — Reply This entry was posted on Tuesday, October 21st, 2008 at 11:46 am by Anil Polat and is filed under Tutorial Tuesday. It seems like libpkix DOES process the Netscape cert type extension.

I wish there is a way to bypass validation of certificates like > in version 29 of firefox and other browsers(chrome). Comment 2 David Keeler [:keeler] (use needinfo?) 2015-01-09 17:09:30 PST (In reply to David Keeler [:keeler] (use needinfo?) from comment #1) > I don't know what the equivalent command is in Couldn't figure it out. Check This Out RD Woodson How to Remove and Delete Favicons on Google Chrome and Firefox Browsers: Excellent and concise instructions.

Comment 17 Kathleen Wilson 2014-08-18 13:27:22 PDT (In reply to David Keeler (:keeler) [use needinfo?] from comment #16) > > I think option 1 is reasonable. Andy L. http://securitymusings.com/article/415/perspectives-firefox-extension eJoe View November 11, 2008 So what I don't get is the huge number of sites as a SysAdmin that I have to get to on my internal network that Comment 16 David Keeler [:keeler] (use needinfo?) 2014-08-15 11:28:06 PDT Created attachment 8473800 [details] [diff] [review] patch I think option 1 is reasonable.

But warnings about things that most people don't understand will continue to fly right over their heads and have them miss out on plenty of legitimate sites. In particular, if the user is trusting the root CA from which these certificates were issued, then the user shouldn't get a cert error page just because this extension is present The error is gives is: ‘Secure Connection Failed. msyed1 0 LVL 33 Overall: Level 33 SSL / HTTPS 14 Network Security 5 Windows Server 2008 5 Message Assisted Solution by:Dave Howe Dave Howe earned 333 total points ID: